Tuesday 8 March 2016

A Comparison of Ordination Vows


A Comparison of Ordination Vows

I have had the privilege of serving in three presbyterian denominations, the Church of Scotland, The Orthodox Presbyterian Church, and the Free Church of Scotland.  In each I sincerely and honesty subscribed to certain ordination questions. However, in the Church of Scotland these vows were meaningless for many who took them – they had no genuine commitment to the Confession of Faith. In the OPC and the FCS biblical discipline is maintained, and the required promises are enforced.  Both the FCS and the OPC were born in secession and separation from a mother church for doctrinal reasons.  Similarly, the Presbyterian Church in America, (PCA), was a church that separated from a doctrinally compromised denomination.

It is a useful exercise to compare the ordination vows of these three denominations:

1  SCRIPTURE

OPC
Do you believe the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the Word of God, the only infallible rule of faith and practice?

PCA
Do you believe the Scriptures of the Old and NewTestaments, as originally given, to be the inerrant Word of God, the only infallible rule of faith and practice?

FCS
Do you believe the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the Word of God, and the only rule of faith and manners?

All three focus on the place of Scripture as a rule for faith and practice. (The FCS uses “manners” in the archaic sense of “conduct”.  It is always possible that someone thinks this is about etiquette rather than conduct.)  The OPC and PCA specifically speak of the inerrancy and infallibility of Scripture.


2  CONFESSION OF FAITH

OPC
Do you sincerely receive and adopt the Confession of Faith and Catechisms of this Church, as containing the system of doctrine taught in the Holy Scriptures?

PCA
Do you sincerely receive and adopt the Confession of Faith and the Catechisms of this Church, as containing the system of doctrine taught in the Holy Scriptures; and do you further promise that if at any time you find yourself out of accord with any of the fundamentals of this system of doctrine, you will on your own initiative, make known to your Presbytery the change which has taken place in your views since the assumption of this ordination vow?

FCS
Do you sincerely own and believe the whole doctrine contained in the Confession of Faith, approven by former General Assemblies of this Church, to be founded upon the Word of God; and do you acknowledge the same as the confession of your faith ; and will you firmly and constantly adhere thereto, and to the utmost of your power assert, maintain, and defend the same, and the purity of worship as presently practised in this Church ?

The language of the FCS is again somewhat archaic and verbose.  Both the FCS and the PCA use language that requires a candidate to continue in adherence to the Confession whereas that is not made explicit in the OPC vow.  The FCS also includes a commitment to the purity of worship in this vow.

3  CHURCH GOVERNMENT AND DISCIPLINE

OPC
Do you approve of the government, discipline, and worship of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church?
Do you promise subjection to your brethren in the Lord?

PCA
Do you approve of the form of government and discipline of the Presbyterian Church in America, in conformity with the general principles of Biblical polity?
Do you promise subjection to your brethren in the Lord?

FCS
Are you persuaded that the Presbyterian government and discipline of this Church are founded upon the Word of God, and agreeable thereto; and do you promise to submit to the said government and discipline, and to concur with the same, and not to endeavour, directly or indirectly, the prejudice or subversion thereof, but to the utmost of your power, in your station, to maintain, support, and defend the said discipline and Presbyterian government by Kirk-Session, Presbyteries, Provincial Synods, and General Assemblies?

Also

Do you promise to submit yourself willingly and humbly, in the spirit of meekness, unto the admonitions of the brethren of this Presbytery, and to be subject to them, and all other Presbyteries and superior judicatories of this Church, where God in His providence shall cast your lot; and that, according to your power, you shall maintain the unity and peace of this Church against error and schism, notwithstanding of whatsoever trouble or persecution may arise, and that you shall follow no divisive courses from the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government of this Church?

Again the FCS language is somewhat archaic and verbose, but spells out in detail a commitment to biblical Presbyterianism. The FCS also explains what it means to be subject to our brothers in the Lord


4  MINISTERIAL LIFE

OPC
Have you been induced, as far as you know your own heart, to seek the office of the holy ministry from love to God and a sincere desire to promote his glory in the gospel of his Son?
Do you promise to be zealous and faithful in maintaining the truths of the gospel and the purity, the peace, and the unity of the church, whatever persecution or opposition may arise unto you on that account?
Do you promise to be faithful and diligent in the exercise of all private and personal duties which become you as a Christian and a minister of the gospel, as well as in all the duties of your office, endeavoring to adorn the profession of the gospel by your life, and walking with exemplary piety before the flock over which God shall make you overseer?

PCA
Have you been induced, as far as you know your own heart, to seek the office of the holy ministry from love to God and a sincere desire to promote His glory in the Gospel of His Son?
Do you promise to be zealous and faithful in maintaining the truths of the Gospel and the purity and peace and unity of the Church, whatever persecution or opposition may arise unto you on that account?
Do you engage to be faithful and diligent in the exercise of all your duties as a Christian and a minister of the Gospel, whether personal or relational, private or public; and to endeavor by the grace of God to adorn the profession of the Gospel in your manner of life, and to walk with exemplary piety before the flock of which God shall make you overseer?

FCS
Are not zeal for the honour of God, love to Jesus Christ, and desire of saving souls, your great motives and chief inducements to enter into the function of the holy ministry, and not worldly designs and interests?
Have you used any undue methods, either by yourself or others, in procuring this call?
Do you engage, in the strength and grace of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Master, to rule well your own family, to live a holy and circumspect life, and faithfully, diligently, and cheerfully to discharge all the parts of the ministerial work, to the edification of the body of Christ?

All three denominations look for godliness of conduct and a holy life in their ministers.  Ministers are not only teachers, they are to be examples to the flock.

5  CALL TO A PARTICULAR CONGREGATION

OPC
Are you now willing to take the charge of this congregation, in agreement with your declaration when you accepted their call? And do you promise to discharge the duties of a pastor to them as God shall give you strength?

PCA
Are you now willing to take the charge of this church, agreeable to your declaration when accepting their call? And do you, relying upon God for strength, promise to discharge to it the duties of a pastor?

FCS
Do you accept of and close with the call to be pastor of this congregation, and promise, through grace, to perform all the duties of a faithful minister of the gospel among this people?


6  REJECTION OF ERRORS

OPC – None

PCA – None

FCS
Do you disown all Popish, Arian, Socinian, Arminian, Erastian, and other doctrines, tenets, and opinions whatsoever, contrary to, and inconsistent with, the foresaid Confession of Faith?

The OPC and PCA rest in a positive acceptance of the doctrines of the Confession; the FCS also insists on a renunciation of errors.  These particular errors are those of 1647.  Although still relevant today, there is no renunciation of major current theological errors such as false charismatic revelations, the Federal Vision theology, or of major moral errors such as the acceptance of homosexual conduct in the church.


7  ADHERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL CAUSE OF SECESSION

OPC – None

PCA – None

FCS
Do you believe that the Lord Jesus Christ, as King and Head of the Church, has therein appointed a government in the hands of Church-officers, distinct from, and not subordinate in its own province to, civil government, and that the Civil Magistrate does not possess jurisdiction or authoritative control over the regulation of the affairs of Christ’s Church; and do you approve of the general principles embodied in the Claim, Declaration, and Protest, adopted by the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland in 1842, and in the Protest of Ministers and Elders, Commissioners from Presbyteries to the General Assembly, read in presence of the Royal Commissioner on 18th May 1843, as declaring the views which are sanctioned by the Word of God, and the standards of this Church, with respect to the spirituality and freedom of the Church of Christ, and her subjection to Him as her only Head, and to His Word as her only standard?

All three churches were born of secession. (OPC from the PCUSA, 1936; PCA from the PCUS, 1973; FCS from the Church of Scotland, 1843)  The FCS alone imbeds the history of this secession in its public ordination vows, requiring office-bearers to verbally adhere to the formal cause of secession.

It could be argued that while the original cause of secession of the FCS is important, it is no longer necessary or appropriate that this be included in the public ordination vows.  It is now 173 years since the secession; will the FCS still be requiring this public commitment in 2043?

It is interesting that the FCS did not originally require this public affirmation of its ordinands – they subscribed to a written statement to the same effect, but the formal ordination service did not include this lengthy and historical statement.  The questions were used under Interim Acts of Assembly from 1844, though the formula was first adopted in 1846.  

(See: “Report of the Scottish sub-committee on creeds and formulas of subscription to the General Presbyterian council to be held at Philadelphia in 1880".  This is an extremely interesting study of the history of subscription in various denominations in Scotland up to 1880)

So, here are a number of issues that this comparison of ordination vows raises, particularly for the FCS.  Firstly, should the public service of ordination not be in contemporary language, rather than frozen in the language of 1843 and before? Secondly, is the public abjuration of specific errors necessary, given that the positive commitment to the Confession already covers such errors?  Similarly, if the public abjuration of specific errors is required, why these specific errors alone and not contemporary errors?  Also, is a public adherence to specific historical documents of 1842 and 1843 still relevant to the FCS today, and if it is, can it be done, as originally was the case, by a written subscription rather than by an oral response?

The FCS is a modern, evangelical and Reformed church.  It may be time to look afresh at our ordination service.  The OPC and PCA give us guidance in this respect.  Our public service of ordination is important; it may be the first time that some of those present have come into contact with the FCS.  Are we giving the impression of a church frozen in the past, or of a vibrant contemporary Reformed church that is moving forward in the cause of the Gospel while retaining our full commitment to Reformed orthodoxy?